Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email


News: - Make sure you know the Forum Rules and Guidelines

Also check out these related sites:

Author Topic: Recordings  (Read 44250 times)

OfflineJules

  • Honorary Knopfler fans- Editor
  • Mark F. Knopfler
  • **********
  • Posts: 13350
  • Location: Gone
  • Registered: August 2008
Recordings
« on: November 16, 2009, 06:53:54 PM »
Hello

Does any of you know about IEM recordings,  or know any kind of live recording forums with information about it?

Please send me a PM  :)
So Long

OfflineHoops McCann

  • Dan
  • Founder
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
  • Location: Floating Away
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2009, 10:31:58 PM »
Personally, I don't think this topic should be here, but as jbaent asked for info via PM, this will be left as is.
"...I was prompted to check out some of the threads you have going which are often unintentionally funny, wildly speculative and sometimes just plain deluded..." - Ed Bicknell

https://soundcloud.com/sunday_driver

OfflineJules

  • Honorary Knopfler fans- Editor
  • Mark F. Knopfler
  • **********
  • Posts: 13350
  • Location: Gone
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2009, 05:46:12 PM »
Thanks Dan  :)

Now waiting for some information, thanks!  :D
So Long

Offlinelocalhero1986

  • Lady writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 705
  • Registered: August 2009
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2009, 08:40:08 PM »
IEM recordings SUCK.

Reason #1: It is a monitor mix and no representation of the actual music. The worst mix you can have actually.

Reason #2: A certain person in London made an IEM recording back in 2008. Guy was busy solving the problem. Therefore there was no time left to organize a M&G. It was also the last opportunity for a M&G for me (and a friend of mine). So this idiot SCREWED my M&G in Cologne (yes, thank you!). >:( >:(

So, I just say it once: don't break in for IEM recordings as the recording itself is useless, you disturb the band AND your fellow fans!!!
« Last Edit: November 17, 2009, 08:42:11 PM by localhero1986 »

Onlinedustyvalentino

  • Not Quite The Movie Star
  • Founder
  • THE Sultan of Swing
  • *********
  • Posts: 7190
  • Location: Donkeytown
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2009, 09:13:59 PM »
Ouch. That whole situation was a nightmare.
"You can't polish a doo-doo" - Mark Knopfler

OfflinePottel

  • Founder
  • Founder
  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9790
  • Location: Recklinghausen, Germany
  • Registered: August 2008
    • A Mark In Time
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2009, 09:25:47 PM »
yup, right on localhero!
no one can seriously prefer an IEM rec. to a genuine soundboard, or top quality rec. like the ones martina or george wang makes them, or a certain young fella in the NYC area :-)
any Knopfler, Floyd or Dylan will do....

Love Expresso

  • Guest
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2009, 07:41:01 AM »
Yes. But when we all had the chance to get the IEM from Boothbay, nobody complained about its quality...

LE

Offlinerudiger

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2009, 09:23:18 AM »
IEM recordings have not the best mix, but they are better than nothing or than many audience recordings. Of course soundboard would be the best. Said that, we know the band is annoyed by this kind of recordings, so I would not encourage anybody to make one. But, without hypocrisy, if I know that an IEM recording exists I'd like to have it ;D (without to make publicity on a public forum)

OfflineJeroenvG

  • Lady writer
  • ****
  • Follow me on "twitter.com/vanDiemensLand"
  • Posts: 555
  • Location: Zwolle The Netherlands
  • Registered: August 2008
    • Alles Muziek (Dutch)
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2009, 10:01:05 AM »
IEM recording is the worst recording. I have 1 IEM recording from the last U2 tour and you can hear a computer voice counting down from 10 to 1. And thru the whole song that computer voice is saying when to start a song and when the bass comes in etc etc.

I prefer audience recording to feel the concert atmosphere.
"I could play my accordion And charm all of the women And dance round the taproom With a chair in my teeth"

Onlinedustyvalentino

  • Not Quite The Movie Star
  • Founder
  • THE Sultan of Swing
  • *********
  • Posts: 7190
  • Location: Donkeytown
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2009, 10:43:11 AM »
IEM recording is the worst recording. I have 1 IEM recording from the last U2 tour and you can hear a computer voice counting down from 10 to 1. And thru the whole song that computer voice is saying when to start a song and when the bass comes in etc etc.

I prefer audience recording to feel the concert atmosphere.

That's very interesting. Shows that a U2 show is hardly "live" at all, just pre-programmed for them to play along with and fit in with light shows etc. With MK there is scope for improvisation and change, even if it doesn't happen very often.

Also, as far as I am aware, nobody knows for sure if Boothbay was IEM.
"You can't polish a doo-doo" - Mark Knopfler

Offlinedmg

  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9318
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Registered: August 2009
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2009, 11:06:00 AM »
Wonder what a Britney Spears IEM recording sounds like!! ;D
"...and I blew up the radio in pretty short order."

OfflineSimon

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2009, 12:03:52 PM »
IEM recording is the worst recording. I have 1 IEM recording from the last U2 tour and you can hear a computer voice counting down from 10 to 1. And thru the whole song that computer voice is saying when to start a song and when the bass comes in etc etc.

I prefer audience recording to feel the concert atmosphere.

That's very interesting. Shows that a U2 show is hardly "live" at all, just pre-programmed for them to play along with and fit in with light shows etc. With MK there is scope for improvisation and change, even if it doesn't happen very often.

Also, as far as I am aware, nobody knows for sure if Boothbay was IEM.

Bono showing his age and the fact his memory isn't as good as it was maybe;-)

Offlineds1984

  • Rüdiger
  • *******
  • Used to be...
  • Posts: 3777
  • Registered: February 2009
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2009, 12:31:46 PM »
IEM is not good or bad it is what the sound engineer mix in it.

To date the best available 2001 recording is IEM sourced.

To date nothing from 2008 is available in sbd quality

And how an IEM stealth can disturb things? Let me explain this please.
















The haters are those who write shit

Two weeks in Australia and Sydney striptease

Onlinedustyvalentino

  • Not Quite The Movie Star
  • Founder
  • THE Sultan of Swing
  • *********
  • Posts: 7190
  • Location: Donkeytown
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2009, 12:42:21 PM »
The IEM recordings of TLWNF and SoS that were released before it all went tits up sounded pretty good to my ears.
"You can't polish a doo-doo" - Mark Knopfler

OfflinePottel

  • Founder
  • Founder
  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9790
  • Location: Recklinghausen, Germany
  • Registered: August 2008
    • A Mark In Time
Re: Wireless Recordings
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2009, 01:25:53 PM »
britney,...a bit like the album i guess  ;D ;D
as dusty said, no one really knew for sure as to whether or not it was IEM.
any Knopfler, Floyd or Dylan will do....

 

© 2024 amarkintime.org
This is an unofficial website dedicated to Mark Knopfler developed and maintained by fans.
Top banner design by Dutchessy.
This theme is based on the SMF theme Carbonate by Bloc.
SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 40 queries.