Hi everybody
I'm just an old french fan who grew up with Dire straits, and have long since moved to very very different genres of music.
Let's just say that I love DS' music because that's where I started, I love MK, they are like "madeleines de Proust" for me. They can bring tears to my eyes even though the man I am now doesn't understand or cares for mark's artistic choices since BIA.
I have read your comments and decided to buy a hi-res digital version of the live box set.
I expected a huge disappointement but I happen to love it for what it is.
No surprise, I'm in love with the Rainbow concert. Because I love the early straits, but mostly because of their ENERGY that night (but also on their records in those years).
Energy doesn't mean playing fast or loud, in my opinion. But it has to do with keeping a minimum of tension in the music. Even slow numbers are tense in that concert.
MK is totally in it, just listen to the way he sings. Tension needs building, resolution, it needs life. I wanted a good recording of that concert ever since I saw the bbc arena doc on the alchemy bluray. I'm more than happy !
It is my opinion that dire straits let much of their life and energy slide away after the LOG tour. The question would be : why ?
What I find very interesting in Chris Witten's posts (thank you so very much for that !) is his use of the word "scripted". Scripted music.
Chris witten's words (playing that tom at that very moment) remind me of Pick Withers' words about the On location tour in a yt interview : when he did something cool, he was told to do the very same trick at the very same moment each night and he clearly didn't like it. It couldn't have the same energy and sincerity once it was "scripted".
Mark's quest for total control certainly is the main motive in DS history and in his own music since then, and even in most of his collaborations with others. His search for freedom has, in my opinion, led to a more and more contrived style of music. A paradox to be sure. Or is it ?
OTN illustrates just that. I like Chris witten's work on that tour. In fact I like everybody's work. More or less : Phil palmer's style I don't like, Guy fletcher sounds and influence even less, and Chris White's piano bar saxophone invading every classic DS song I just can't stand. But that was Mark's vision !! So that's what I have a problem with. Mark's vision for dire straits from 1984 onward is not my cup of tea.
Still, I do enjoy OTN more than I expected.
Calling Elvis live is much better than the studio version, chris playing Jeff Porcaro's parts is great. He and Danny sound and look very much alive, I like it.
The OES songs are much better played live to my ears.
That said, that scripted show for nine performers cannot convey much energy. It has nothing to do with each musician's part, it has to do with the whole thing. And with MK too. He is not too "energic" himself and looked bored on that tour. Paul mc Cartney has much more energy than MK !
Mk has complained a lot with things getting too big. But they do not necessarily have to be that big on stage. A stage setup which, according to chris witten himself, had an impact on the way he heard things and the way he had to play. Was music the priority then ? One can wonder.
Many big bands make big tours without turning into that kind of programmed monsters. Tours are always demanding and tiring, but they can still keep the music alive. Sometimes very much alive.
All in all, that version of OTN is much better setlist-wise than the original. I didn't understand the choices made on the original cd and found it very lacking.
We now have a complete show, that's always a good thing.
So I'm happy with it.
Alchemy, I'm happy to have industrial disease, no matter how strange the sound is. And portebello too, although I'm not fond of Mel's jamming on it.
I agree with many of you that twisting by the pool is one "twisting song" too far on alchemy. All in all, I'll keep listening to the older version of that album.
Live at the BBC brings nothing new and many bootlegs from that period are much more interesting and satisfying. I do like it but never listen to it.
In the end, the live at the Rainbow and the now complete OTN show are the positive points of that box, the reasons to buy, so to speak. In my personal opinion.
I wonder why they have not produced deluxe editions of the original Live albums (and studio !!) plus a Live at the Rainbow, instead of packing it all in a box where you have to buy everything at once. Strange strategy, once more. Or just the rainbowor whatever.
As for the sound of the whole thing, it certainly could have been better. Mark's and Guy Fletcher's choices in terms of production, I don't understand, or don't appreciate. With all due respect, I never understood mk's now life long association with GF. Is Guy the ultimate "yes man" ?
Not my cup of tea.
But that doesn't stop me from enjoying the good things we get with this box.