Teenage Cancer Trust /Buddy Holly Fundation charity project

[Dutchessy]

There should also be a radio edit, Guy said it was around 4-5 minutes?

[Robson]

There should also be a radio edit, Guy said it was around 4-5 minutes?

I heard this version on Polish radio.

[Vesper]

There should also be a radio edit, Guy said it was around 4-5 minutes?

I heard this version on Polish radio.

Cool!

Any chance you can contact them for a digital version?

[Robson]

There should also be a radio edit, Guy said it was around 4-5 minutes?

I heard this version on Polish radio.

Cool!

Any chance you can contact them for a digital version?

This can be very difficult.

[Vesper]

There should also be a radio edit, Guy said it was around 4-5 minutes?

I heard this version on Polish radio.

Cool!

Any chance you can contact them for a digital version?

This can be very difficult.

Difficult is not the same as impossible.
Just try and see...

[Robson]

There should also be a radio edit, Guy said it was around 4-5 minutes?

I heard this version on Polish radio.

Cool!

Any chance you can contact them for a digital version?

This can be very difficult.

Difficult is not the same as impossible.
Just try and see...

Ok:)

[JF]

So these are all the different versions of the song:

- the shorter one in the lp

- the long one in the cd

- an even shorter played at the St James's stadium

- another one specially made for the Atmos demonstrations at British Grove

- an even more extended one for the video

- the shorter from the Lp and the long from the cd mixed for atmos

And seems the only difference is the length of it, and the kind of sound (stereo or Atmos)

the video will be longer ? I didn't know that

[Jules]

So these are all the different versions of the song:

- the shorter one in the lp

- the long one in the cd

- an even shorter played at the St James's stadium

- another one specially made for the Atmos demonstrations at British Grove

- an even more extended one for the video

- the shorter from the Lp and the long from the cd mixed for atmos

And seems the only difference is the length of it, and the kind of sound (stereo or Atmos)

the video will be longer ? I didn't know that

Guy said that he extended the intro to accommodate what they did to illustrate who play when.

[Jules]

If I thought the audio was a mess, with this video is even worst! so difficult to follow, the animation doesn't helps...

[Love Expresso]

Much better than expected. What a hell of work this must have been to put together.  I think this is a perfect way to show who played what and when. The bigger the letters, the more prominent in the mix. Easy! Very nice!

Astonished that Bruce Springsteen really has many notes to play, really a very long part compared to others.

And Clapton on acoustic guitar?

LE

[Rolo]

If I thought the audio was a mess, with this video is even worst! so difficult to follow, the animation doesn't helps...

One thing is for sure.
Some Clapton maniacs here (at least one) was surprised by Orianthi and Bonamassa.
Joe sounds exactly like Eric when he uses a stratocaster.

[Dutchessy]

Wow so cool! It's Orianthi were we al thought it was Eric Claptop. And my favourite part seems to be played by Joan Armatrading (i expected Eric).

[quizzaciously]

Much better than expected. What a hell of work this must have been to put together.  I think this is a perfect way to show who played what and when. The bigger the letters, the more prominent in the mix. Easy! Very nice!

Astonished that Bruce Springsteen really has many notes to play, really a very long part compared to others.

LE

Bruce Springsteen sounds more like Hank Marvin than Hank Marvin sounds like Hank Marvin.

[Darling Pretty]

Very cool.
Now we know. Yes Stefan we both were on the wrong path. It was Orianthi. Never thought that.
She has quite a few licks in there. Cool

[quizzaciously]

If I thought the audio was a mess, with this video is even worst! so difficult to follow, the animation doesn't helps...

It was a mess from the start, so no surprise. This intro sounds better though, if only they would trim the ending as well. It makes me wonder how I would do it.

It's of course a topic of discussion, but I would probably make sure to have a list of all the names of players written on the screen, flashing when they are heard, or constantly glowing if they are heard all the time. Maybe something like a tag cloud with a player's name getting bigger. Anyhow, there are some ideas. At least I would make it consistent so it's easier to follow who's playing, which IS the purpose of the video, right? But overall, not bad.

Bottom line, my scores would be: Cause 10/10, Idea 1/10, Recording 6/10, Video 6/10, Design 7/10, so 30/50 — not bad, but could be drastically improved.