Came a bit late here, because although I bought the hardback edition when it was first issued, I kept it aside until I found a few spare days, with a clear mind to read and enjoy it. Unfortunately years passed and I never found the right time, until a dear friend of mine brought me the paperback edition. So I have made up my mind, that the best time is now, so yesterday I started reading it on the train to work. Haven't finished it yet, but I have just reached the end of part 1 where he meets MK for the first time. I read all the comments here before starting it. Very few spoilers, since most people didn't care about this part. Dare I say that this part of the book is very well written, with many well served details about his childhood and his relation with his parents and his younger sibling. The description of the times in the UK was very nice, setting the background, and although the details were not plenty, (after all it is his life with DS,) and the writing style was not as distinctive and flourishing as Stephen Fry's autobiography (which was surely written by Fry himself -btw. if there is a shadow writer in Illsley's book he is a good one - so far), I found it quite pleasing and setting the tone and pace. Some nice things I found out, apart from how similar is the riff for "Move it" and "If I had you", (silly I haven't noticed all this time): I really connected with the way he felt about school, leaving home, about not settling early on in life for a well paid job, about giving fair due to the people and circumstances that would later shape his life, ie. how he picked up the bass guitar and how he returned to the university, etc. Emphasizing on these matters reveals a part of his characters - or at least (ah, this shadow writer...) knows how to make the man in question likable. Mentioning somewhere about the taxation system back in the 70ies, with examples like Elton John and Thin Lizzy, took me a bit by surprise, but I guess it was meant as a counter balance for his then socialist tendencies. Isn't it weird how a man can interpret his past, given his present status? Anyway, all in all I quite liked this introductory part of the book. Will return with more about the rest.