Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email


News: - Make sure you know the Forum Rules and Guidelines

Also check out these related sites:

Author Topic: (06) Good on you Son  (Read 131881 times)

OfflineSilvertown

  • Lady writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 773
  • Registered: April 2010
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #120 on: September 17, 2018, 06:41:37 PM »
How do you describe the song soundwise? How is mixing? Drums far on the back?

Offlinelfblaauw

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
  • Location: Netherlands
  • Registered: June 2009
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #121 on: September 17, 2018, 06:57:30 PM »
I'm also curious about this song. Can someone send me a PM? Thanks in advance  :)

hunter

  • Guest
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #122 on: September 17, 2018, 07:03:13 PM »
How do you describe the song soundwise? How is mixing? Drums far on the back?

Drums are not too far back, and it sounds like there's some room ambience mixed in with the drums. Overall the sound is slightly dry, but there's a lot of detail and layers, so I'm looking forward to playing the CD on my hifi. Mark's vocals have some kind of slapback echo, which I find a little artifical.

Offlinekaleo74

  • Lady writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: Montreal, Canada
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #123 on: September 17, 2018, 07:04:31 PM »
Hi guys,
If someone can PM me the song would be appreciated, want to know what are talking about here lol
Thank you
If I realised that the chances were slim,
How come I'm so surprised when the tide rolled in

OfflineDS

  • Local Hero
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Location: Italy
  • Registered: January 2018
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #124 on: September 17, 2018, 07:07:43 PM »
Hi guys,
If someone can PM me the song would be appreciated, want to know what are talking about here lol
Thank you

I'd love a PM too... each message talking about the song is a torture!!  ;D
Thanks!
Tracker - Lucca 2015
DTRW - Lucca 2019

OfflineSilvertown

  • Lady writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 773
  • Registered: April 2010
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #125 on: September 17, 2018, 07:08:49 PM »
How do you describe the song soundwise? How is mixing? Drums far on the back?

Drums are not too far back, and it sounds like there's some room ambience mixed in with the drums. Overall the sound is slightly dry, but there's a lot of detail and layers, so I'm looking forward to playing the CD on my hifi. Mark's vocals have some kind of slapback echo, which I find a little artifical.

Thanks! I love these first impressions and feeling of the song.

hunter

  • Guest
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #126 on: September 17, 2018, 07:11:16 PM »
I think I hear a triangle in the mix too.

OfflineRobson

  • Brother in Arms
  • ********
  • Posts: 4356
  • Location: PL
  • Registered: July 2009
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #127 on: September 17, 2018, 07:18:55 PM »
I am surprised by this song. Positively. It is completely different from earlier ones. This modern electronics at the beginning. We've heard something similar (Basil) but here the scale is bigger. Mark is in great shape.
I know the way I can see by the moonlight
Clear as the day
Now come on woman, come follow me home

OfflineDS

  • Local Hero
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Location: Italy
  • Registered: January 2018
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #128 on: September 17, 2018, 07:26:42 PM »
Honestly I wasn't having great expectations but god, this is good stuff.
Tracker - Lucca 2015
DTRW - Lucca 2019

OfflinePensaGhost

  • Banned
  • Romeo
  • *****
  • Posts: 1506
  • Location: Italy
  • Registered: September 2017
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #129 on: September 17, 2018, 07:31:57 PM »
I think it's unlistenable but glad most of you are happy with it :)
A Pensaboy who later became a Pensaghost http://pensaboy.altervista.org/guitar.html

OfflineEddie Fox

  • Romeo
  • *****
  • Posts: 1304
  • Location: Rio de Janeiro
  • Registered: August 2012
    • Ed Raposo
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #130 on: September 17, 2018, 07:39:32 PM »
Damn, I missed that train. Any functional link, guys?
I am the Iron Fist. Protector of K'un-Lun. Sworn enemy of the Hand.

OfflineDS

  • Local Hero
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Location: Italy
  • Registered: January 2018
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #131 on: September 17, 2018, 07:40:08 PM »
I think it's unlistenable but glad most of you are happy with it :)

The worst parts imho are the sax and that thing at 2:24... but I really love the beginning!
Tracker - Lucca 2015
DTRW - Lucca 2019

OfflineH97

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Posts: 350
  • Registered: June 2013
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #132 on: September 17, 2018, 07:49:08 PM »
Way too late to the party, but could someone PM me? Appreciated very much

OfflineRobson

  • Brother in Arms
  • ********
  • Posts: 4356
  • Location: PL
  • Registered: July 2009
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #133 on: September 17, 2018, 07:49:26 PM »
However, my first song list has not changed much:

Redbud Tree
Golden Heart/ What It Is
Border Reiver
Beryl
Good On You Son/Why Aye Man
True Love Will Never Fade
Boom, Like That
I know the way I can see by the moonlight
Clear as the day
Now come on woman, come follow me home

Offlinemon

  • Guitar George
  • Posts: 17
  • Registered: March 2010
Re: Single: Good on you Son
« Reply #134 on: September 17, 2018, 07:50:51 PM »
I am surprised by this song. Positively. It is completely different from earlier ones. This modern electronics at the beginning. We've heard something similar (Basil) but here the scale is bigger. Mark is in great shape.
I think you're right. Sounds like Mark's strato using Adrenalinn3 just like he used on Basil.
Perfect!!!!!!!

 

© 2024 amarkintime.org
This is an unofficial website dedicated to Mark Knopfler developed and maintained by fans.
Top banner design by Dutchessy.
This theme is based on the SMF theme Carbonate by Bloc.
SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Page created in 0.039 seconds with 43 queries.