Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email


News: - Make sure you know the Forum Rules and Guidelines

Also check out these related sites:

Author Topic: Get lucky on the web?  (Read 44482 times)

OfflineGeordieboy

  • Local Hero
  • **
  • Forever Mark
  • Posts: 57
  • Location: Italia
  • Registered: April 2009
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #30 on: April 17, 2009, 12:01:01 PM »
I agree with jbaent in mid, because we are fans and listening Sultans is always a pleasure, but we are fans with ears.
For me at the RAH he played very well, in Milano the final part of the song was a disaster: too slow, too mistakes and no flow of execution.
I don't agree with jbaent in one point: the Great Master of every time, need practice to play Sultans? ???
But in the other side:
- if a friend asks you "give me the best SOS live version", who of you would reccomend one of the KTGCtour version?

Marco

Sorry for my poor english, i hope you understand what i said.

Offlinesuperval99

  • Erwin Knopfler
  • **********
  • Posts: 7609
  • Location: UK
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #31 on: April 17, 2009, 12:25:52 PM »
If I had to choose the best SOS of all time, then, no I wouldn't choose one from KTGC, I would probably choose Basel '92 or perhaps A Night in London, but certainly there were very good renditions on the KTGC tour, just as there were not so good ones on previous tours like STP and Shangri-La. 

It doesn't seem to have anything to do with MK getting older and his fingers not being so nimble, either because I have enjoyed some of the best TR's on the KTGC tour and his fingers were flying!  :)  

If I wanted to hear perfection every time, I would listen to the album, but I don't very much these days.  I prefer listening to some of the wonderful recordings from the various tours.   They may not be perfect every time, but I find them more interesting.

I also think some folk are looking back through rose-tinted spectacles, saying MK is not what he used to be.  Even the much-lauded Rockpalast was not perfect, but it was non-the-less extremely enjoyable and a wonderful show to look back on.

Whatever, the audience always seem to enjoy hearing SOS played and so do I.   :)  Relish the moment while it's happening!  :D
« Last Edit: April 17, 2009, 01:02:55 PM by superval99 »
Goin' into Tow Law....

OfflineGeordieboy

  • Local Hero
  • **
  • Forever Mark
  • Posts: 57
  • Location: Italia
  • Registered: April 2009
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #32 on: April 17, 2009, 02:51:18 PM »
The only thing i can say it's that the KTGC tour was, for me, the best of the tree (four) last tours.
Because of Hill Farmer Blues, Postcards, Going Home, The fish and the bird, S-La, BIA and autstandings versions of Speedway and for many more reasons (Mark himself looking better).
I allways looking forward: i don't compare Mark 2008 to Mark 92, 78 ecc...to that?
Now i'm looking for the autumn, for the new album and for another marvellous tour.
but, can i say that i don 't liked the SOS version of the last tour?

Offlinesuperval99

  • Erwin Knopfler
  • **********
  • Posts: 7609
  • Location: UK
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #33 on: April 17, 2009, 03:00:09 PM »
Geordieboy, I enjoyed KTGC very much too, for much the same reasons as you.  It was certainly one of my favourite tours, along with the Shangri-La tour and, especially Golden Heart.   Of course, you can say you didn't like SOS fro the KTGC tour, everyone is entitled to give their own opinion and we are all different. 

I'm looking forward very much to the next tour, too!    :D 
Goin' into Tow Law....

OfflineGeordieboy

  • Local Hero
  • **
  • Forever Mark
  • Posts: 57
  • Location: Italia
  • Registered: April 2009
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #34 on: April 17, 2009, 03:18:30 PM »
Of course, you can say you didn't like SOS fro the KTGC tour, everyone is entitled to give their own opinion and we are all different. 

It wasn my intention to create unnecessary controversy. It was only a rhetorical question, not against you ;D

OfflineIrisRose

  • Not just another angel
  • Founder
  • Romeo
  • *****
  • Posts: 1377
  • Location: beautiful northeastern California USA
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #35 on: April 17, 2009, 04:54:07 PM »
I don't think anyone took your comments personally, Geordieboy.    We all respect one another's opinions here.    I think even Mark himself would be critical of some of his own performances.  That is why he looks ahead.    He is so good, and such a genius, that he probably knows as he is playing the song that he wants to do it differently next time.   

This forum is for your being able to express you opinion.   You are doing just fine.  Your English is good, much better than my Italian!   :)   
You are welcome here and your opinions are welcome.    Keep writing!
But a spoonful of forgiveness
Goes a long, long way
And we all should do our best
To get along

OfflinePottel

  • Founder
  • Founder
  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9790
  • Location: Recklinghausen, Germany
  • Registered: August 2008
    • A Mark In Time
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #36 on: April 17, 2009, 05:03:10 PM »
Well, each to their own, personally I would prefer some improvisation with a few mistakes coming in to overly rehearsed stuff with the same solos every night. You really think MK needs to practise the scales for Sultans at the age of 59, having played it thousands of times over the last 30 years? Sorry, but I think not. :)

Listening how he get lost in the solos, playing wrong notes etc etc, I guess you are wrong  ;D
i know what you mean julio,...but they are his songs, he can do with them what he wants, noodle around, make mistakes, most of the times it is when you try something different that you make a mistake. just my 2cents...
any Knopfler, Floyd or Dylan will do....

OfflinePottel

  • Founder
  • Founder
  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9790
  • Location: Recklinghausen, Germany
  • Registered: August 2008
    • A Mark In Time
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #37 on: April 17, 2009, 05:05:25 PM »
The only thing i can say it's that the KTGC tour was, for me, the best of the tree (four) last tours.
Because of Hill Farmer Blues, Postcards, Going Home, The fish and the bird, S-La, BIA and autstandings versions of Speedway and for many more reasons (Mark himself looking better).
I allways looking forward: i don't compare Mark 2008 to Mark 92, 78 ecc...to that?
Now i'm looking for the autumn, for the new album and for another marvellous tour.
but, can i say that i don 't liked the SOS version of the last tour?
yup GBoy, kinda agree, great tour. no comment on the SOS performance form me.
any Knopfler, Floyd or Dylan will do....

Offlinesuperval99

  • Erwin Knopfler
  • **********
  • Posts: 7609
  • Location: UK
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #38 on: April 17, 2009, 05:39:52 PM »
Geordieboy,  I understand,  I know what you meant and it's really nice to hear your opinions.  I certainly didn't take what you said personally.   :)
Goin' into Tow Law....

OfflineGeordieboy

  • Local Hero
  • **
  • Forever Mark
  • Posts: 57
  • Location: Italia
  • Registered: April 2009
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #39 on: April 17, 2009, 05:46:28 PM »
This forum is for your being able to express you opinion.   You are doing just fine.  Your English is good, much better than my Italian!   :)   
You are welcome here and your opinions are welcome.    Keep writing!

Many thanks for all your words.

Offlineshangri la 1

  • Founder
  • Juliet
  • ******
  • Hi all and welcome to A.M.I.T.
  • Posts: 2260
  • Location: Australia
  • Registered: August 2008
    • AMIT TV
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #40 on: June 24, 2009, 04:22:10 AM »
Looks like they have been at it again.



Mark Knopfler New ALBUM GET LUCKY 2009. COVER OF ONE OF THE NEW SONG OF THE ALBUM GET LUCKY WITH THE PENSA SUHR

Another You-tuber claiming to be doing a cover of one of the new songs from Get Lucky.
We

OfflineTally

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Posts: 471
  • Registered: June 2009
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #41 on: June 24, 2009, 11:26:33 AM »
Baloney again... ;D

Offlinedustyvalentino

  • Not Quite The Movie Star
  • Founder
  • THE Sultan of Swing
  • *********
  • Posts: 7189
  • Location: Donkeytown
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #42 on: June 24, 2009, 01:19:18 PM »
Well, I just posted a comment making my views clear. :)
"You can't polish a doo-doo" - Mark Knopfler

OfflineGennT

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Where them chilly winds don't blow...
  • Posts: 369
  • Registered: February 2009
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #43 on: June 24, 2009, 01:39:46 PM »
God, what a fool .He may have some guitar skills but that doesn't mean he can promote himself by doing stupid covers of songs that haven't been released yet.Shame on him.

OfflineJules

  • Honorary Knopfler fans- Editor
  • Mark F. Knopfler
  • **********
  • Posts: 13350
  • Location: Gone
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Get lucky on the web?
« Reply #44 on: June 29, 2009, 03:33:11 PM »
God, what a fool .He may have some guitar skills but that doesn't mean he can promote himself by doing stupid covers of songs that haven't been released yet.Shame on him.

Hey hey, a little respect here

He is not guilty that there are so many crazy chasers in the world, he has a goear account and he made this just as a joke to spanish fans in the spanish city mailing list, everybody laugh about it in the spanish city list. Is his fault that there are so many people looking under every stone in every dust road in the world just to find out as many scoops as possible and that this people believe themself as capable to judge something they already doesn
So Long

 

© 2024 amarkintime.org
This is an unofficial website dedicated to Mark Knopfler developed and maintained by fans.
Top banner design by Dutchessy.
This theme is based on the SMF theme Carbonate by Bloc.
SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Page created in 0.046 seconds with 39 queries.