Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email


News: - Make sure you know the Forum Rules and Guidelines

Also check out these related sites:

Author Topic: Mark's Google+ Account  (Read 2584 times)

foma

  • Guest
Mark's Google+ Account
« on: May 20, 2014, 09:44:59 PM »
Noticed the link on the official site?

https://plus.google.com/105487400964953726484/about

It's the official MK Google+ page. Just one question
« Last Edit: May 20, 2014, 09:47:32 PM by foma »

OfflineAr (aka Enlight)

  • Lady writer
  • ****
  • WHAT IT IS.........
  • Posts: 666
  • Location: The Netherlands
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Mark's Google+ Account
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2014, 10:21:39 PM »
it will not looks like this: ;D
 https://plus.google.com/communities/107386041606254651363

Maybe Terry Kilburn knows more .

I guess google+ promotes itself this way
Leaving nothing to interfere,
With the crazy balance of your mind.

Offlineknopflerized

  • Romeo
  • *****
  • I might Get Lucky ...
  • Posts: 1023
  • Location: France
  • Registered: August 2008
    • Mark In Summer Long Ago
Re: Mark's Google+ Account
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2014, 07:00:40 AM »
Google + has created me an account after I've created my email account.. btw I don't use google + .... Should I ?

Offlinewayaman

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Times were tough in geordieland
  • Posts: 204
  • Registered: March 2014
Re: Mark's Google+ Account
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2014, 11:39:38 AM »
Google + is difficult to use compared to facebook. I dont know anyone that heving it, uses it.

By the way, Mk has it by commercial reasons, obviously.

Offlineds1984

  • Rüdiger
  • *******
  • Used to be...
  • Posts: 3776
  • Registered: February 2009
Re: Mark's Google+ Account
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2014, 03:59:10 PM »
Google+ struggle to develop by itself so they try every trick to expand. For example now you have to have one to post comment on Youtube...

It's time to think about to find google alternative as they gained now too much importance on the net.

The haters are those who write shit

Two weeks in Australia and Sydney striptease

Offlinewayaman

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Times were tough in geordieland
  • Posts: 204
  • Registered: March 2014
Re: Mark's Google+ Account
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2014, 04:12:40 PM »
Google+ was ok at the beguining, but they did it more and more complicate and unfriendly little by little, and they are doing the same that they do ever, forcing us to use it until they get tired of it and delete it without asking their users, like google reader, that was fine.

OfflineAr (aka Enlight)

  • Lady writer
  • ****
  • WHAT IT IS.........
  • Posts: 666
  • Location: The Netherlands
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: Mark's Google+ Account
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2014, 05:00:58 PM »
Google + has created me an account after I've created my email account.. btw I don't use google + .... Should I ?

I guess that depends of how special the official MK Google+ becomes  ;D

I do fine without (-:

When you want to unregistered google+  do it properly you can loose your Gmail account when not. (follow the unregistered instruction) carefully )
Leaving nothing to interfere,
With the crazy balance of your mind.

OfflineJustme

  • Romeo
  • *****
  • Kilnockie Supporters Club
  • Posts: 1244
  • Registered: September 2008
Re: Mark's Google+ Account
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2014, 06:37:51 PM »
Google+ was ok at the beguining, but they did it more and more complicate and unfriendly little by little, and they are doing the same that they do ever, forcing us to use it until they get tired of it and delete it without asking their users, like google reader, that was fine.

 :clap
And she's sitting in her Lusso, in the early morning sun.

 

© 2024 amarkintime.org
This is an unofficial website dedicated to Mark Knopfler developed and maintained by fans.
Top banner design by Dutchessy.
This theme is based on the SMF theme Carbonate by Bloc.
SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Page created in 0.057 seconds with 40 queries.