well I said it before, but I don't see the point to ask
Mister Mark Knopfer to play on my album, if I don't want a typical Knopfler sound, or if I ask him to play only few licks barely audible.
Why ask a legendary guitarist to play on a track if it's not to play "iconic", "recognizable" guitar sound ?
It's like if I asked Michel Pettrucciani (RIP) to play on my song, but saying to him ": Well Michel, just play few notes, my other keyboard player will do the rest of the job...."
the steely dan song is a typical example : imagine the brecker-fagen conversation :
- hey did you hear this fantastic new band ? dire straits ?
- ah yes great, I love the guitar player !
- hey why wouldn't we ask him to play on our next record ?
- ah yes good idea ! I want this crisp clean crunch chicken sound ! love it !
- ok ok, but keep 2 other guitarist in the foreground, and let him just on one channel, not too loud please !
I think that the "logical" approach would have been to mix Mark in the center, to have only one lead guitar on this song, and at least to let him play the intro lick. Otherwise, I don't understand the reason to ask him to play on a particular song. the other guitarist could have done the job, and the song wouldn't have been THAT different
the Dylan approach for slow train coming was more logical :
bob played the rhythm, and asked Mark to play typical licks instantly recognizable, to color his songs, and therefore you have a Bob Dylan album with Knopfler guitar on it, not an album with just his name on credits....
I'm not sure I know many things....I learned much from here ! and from you