Thanks for the feedback guys, much appreciated. I hadn't realised they "broke up" before On Every Street. I fully got into the band post BIA, working back then forward to the release of OES. I remember taping a radio "interview", perhaps off uk radio 1 - less an interview, more Mark answering a few questions interspersed with chat and a VoiceOver guy going on about "Philips - the inventor of compact disc". May still have the tape somewhere actually
The one thought I have on the replies to this thread though is why get back together, and why with such a massive accompanying tour? If the BIA tour took such a roll then why essentially repeat that - one final "cash grab" before the final break up and the return to smaller gigs with a solo career? I'm not saying that to be critical either - clearly supply and demand, and making it while you can for yourself and, with such wealth, your children, their children and so on. Wouldn't a few select gigs have been the answer rather than the gruelling event mentioned? Perhaps a few (say 20 or 30) stadium sized gigs with the full ensemble (covering costs etc) before smaller arenas with a paired down band, more intimate audience etc? Ultimately his choice of course, just can't see the reasons for a full scale OES tour which, given the effects of the BIA your, was arguably bound to spell the end.
Final thought / question - Had OES been more successful than BIA would they have continued or was the treturn to lower levels of "success" (defined in this case by album sales, which were still more than 99.9% of bands out there) the reason to close the chapter and move on to different things? Had the heights simply been scaled and there was no higher to go?