Before I start, a few preliminary notes:
1. I had anticipated this response
2. I did not exhibit "enthusiasm" (making a "good fist of it" is a bit short of "enthusiasm")
3. Indeed, I have said, in this thread and others, that I do not much care for the DS sound/approach
4. The same therefore applies to THE STRAITS
5. This is not the same as saying that I don't like the songs ...
6. ... nor that I do not appreciate the musicianship involved
Moving now to the comments made, the questions raised and my own response to those.
3. THE STRAITS have not covered MK material post-DS (hence their name, I suppose)
4. Therefore, the comparison is between THE STRAITS and DS, not what followed
5. For simplicity's sake (and at risk of sounding like a journalist), I'll call this the "classic" MK period
6. This classic period was when MK came to fame and acheived his greatest general popularity
7. The comparison should not be with the whole of Dylan's career but with his "classic" period
8. Some would disagree with me but the 1960s is probably the comparable period
9. I have not kept up with THE STRAITS website (maybe once, early on, to check concert times)
10. I was simply unaware of Alan Clark's views
11. I do not intend to look at them now, so will accept the extracts you've cited at face value
12. On that basis, Clark's comments seem pretty foolish to me
13. And unnecessary
14. And also offensive
15. THE STRAITS hold up musically and this is the aspect he should emphasise
16. Infighting and rivalry (if those are the right nouns) will not bolster his case
17. In terms of the music, material performed and the sound, of DS, MK was obviously pivotal
18. John Illsley, in my opinion, was not
19. Perhaps indirectly (organisation, business skills, personal relationship with MK) but not pivotal
20. There are several Dylan tribute acts
21. Unlike THE STRAITS, they do not play large venues or large-scale festivals
22. Some of these acts are well-received by Dylan fans, some are not
23. In terms of Dylan's classic period (see comments above), I have seen several tribute performers
24. Most are not a patch on Dylan but some I have enjoyed greatly
25. Often, it is not the Dylan clone I like but the person who manages to put on their own twist
26. Someone who manages to find something different, or even new, in a song I know well
27. There is a guy called Joel Gilbert who puts on a tribute show called "Highway 61 Revisited"
28. Often, there are former Dylan sidemen (and a sidewoman) in the band
29. No, I've never seen them but, then, they've never played close to me
30. Moreover, on the one occasion I met Mr Gilbert, I was not much taken with him
31. This was before he formed this tribute act
32. Since then, he has produced several DVDs on Dylan's life
33. I bought the first but have bought no others (enough said)
Finally, on attending shows by THE STRAITS, I certainly clapped their performances (as I enjoyed the shows) but not enough to get up and cheer - and certainly not to cheer wildly. Many, many others who attended did, though. You may feel that those people are misguided. They may feel that you're being too purist.
These guys are jobbing musicians. They have not made the sort of money that MK has made. They have to earn a living. If audiences will turn out for shows by THE STRAITS, why would they not go out on stage. In my view, tribute acts are inherently self-limiting and this is true of THE STRAITS. How will they develop, I wonder?
Finally, perhaps the title of this thread should be corrected.