I know what he is trying to say, and in a sense he is right, that "against all odds" they are able to "manage the legacy", etc. etc. without the main man. But it's just the way he says it. I mean, even though they technically have the right to do what they do, the whole thing leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. Something stinks.
It's bit like David Knopfler too. You know, everytime DS is mentioned, or Mark!, during an interview he gets upset and everything. But as far as I know, he does use the "founding member" label quite actively. And he even sings DS songs during his shows. Just feels odd.