new picture?

[Jules]

twm, WOW, the photos you describe sound fascinating! I would like to see them all! In fact I only saw this one photo that appears at the link that Pottel first mentioned. Of course I don't really care how they are taken, as long as they work both artistically and commercially. It is a very difficult combination that we tend to overlook. And yes, it is all down to personal taste.

Try the link I sent and you will see almost all the pictures.

[shooting_star_night]

Nice Photo

[vgonis]

Thanks jbaent. Regardless if I like them or not, I think they have achieved their original purpose, to stir the public opinion, and create interest-discussion-focus for the artist and the "product". The fact that we don't need such things from our man because we are already "sold", is of little importance to the marketing department. Anyway, the latest (last 100 years) developments in the aesthetics of art, come from the notion that new art has to be different in any expense, even of aesthetics. But I don't believe we can say that for these photos. 

[sak4]

Fact of life that each year MK is older, balder a few more wrinkles - thats life.  He's sensible and down to earth and doesn't try to do anything about it.   I don't think he's too bothered about photos either.

What a nice guy

[superval99]

Fact of life that each year MK is older, balder a few more wrinkles - thats life. 

In spite of all that, I think he's looking better and better as time goes by!   

[twm]

And tubbier, too. As sak4 says, that's life.