And he also keeps on saying that Mark and his band is getting better and better each tour - an opinion I can't share. But that's just my point of view - no offence!
I was thinking about the very same this morning when I listened to the Oberhausen show again. Yes, Ian plays some other stuff than Danny, Jim the same, but if it is really better or not? I haven't made my decision yet. On the other hand, Danny for example played hundreds of shows with MK, Ian is just at the beginning, so he has a lot of time to evolve sure enough. The question is: Is he willing to evolve (not as a drummer of course, but as an MK drummer
)...
Professional as he is, he might have the next engagement fixed already. For Danny, it was obviously always an honour to play for Mark, and it seemed to me that he was not so very much booked out and had so many other commitments, apart from George Michael maybe ...
About Jim, Guy answered a few days ago something that I have trouble to interpret correctly: The question was about Jim and Matt and the question was
Jim is also busier than Matt. Does this infer we can look forward to the new release being busier, musically, to further complement Mark's playing, songwriting and storytelling? Guy answered, in a very definite way:
Sorry, can't let that slip by. Jim is NOT busier than Matt. You couldn't be more wrong with that one. Could this be some kind of misunderstanding, and Guy talks about being busy in general than being busy on the record? Would be interesting to hear your opinions on this one.
LE