There is something I like about David. He always says that every morning he wakes up, drinks his tea and take a guitar or sits in the piano and work on songs, everyday, as that's his work and his passion.
Every single day.
Easy to understand why he's capable of releasing three records a year, with that way of work.
Nowadays, after 25 albums, it's easy to "judge" DK.
I think that he took the wrong way after he leaves DS.
To my understanding, during his period on Dire Straits, he and John were the guys against the band 'modernization'.
David was the guy who wanted to keep the DS original format and style.
If he tooked the way that he took when he released The Giver, maybe he got more credit and sucess and maybe he, today, would get a bigger audience.
IMO, his period as synth-pop artist was terrible.
I know that he follow some germanic musical tendencies during the 80's but, i think that was a mistake.
If he followed the 'roots based' music that the keeps since 1993, his role as 'Founder Of Dire Straits' would be a big plus as he would be the guardian of the DS Original Style.
When DS was accused to be cheesy, he probably would be the "relief" for the accusators.
Well, it's easy to "judge" after 40 years of solo career.
He is passioned by music, that's for sure.
I lke him.