Regulation of the "Internet" says it all... I for one cannot agree to a member that has conjointly been banned for obvious reasons just coming back under another nick name and getting a second chance so easy. For me, this undermines the AMIT rules that I have signed when I started here, the meaning of the term "banned" (well, at least until let's say... next tuesday?) and more important, the AMIT credibility. This is my own opinion. I don't wish to dig any deeper in this and also don't wish any further posts from editors in this case as I see we have some divergent opinions here. Unsatisfying situation, yes, but there are always ways to show one's opinion one way or the other.
LE